Monday, April 30, 2012

Prajñāpāramitā प्रज्ञा पारमिता (A short notes on Prajnaparamita)

Prajñāpāramitā प्रज्ञा पारमिता
(A short notes on Prajnaparamita)
Garud Bhagwan
Simhasarthabahu
Bikramshila Mahabihar, Simhakalpanagar

(Bhagwan Bahal, Thamel
Buddha Era 2552 Nepal Era 1132 Bikram Era 2068 2012 A.D        
Compiled by:  Damodar Pradhan  Monumental Guide

Prajñāpāramitā  प्रज्ञा पारमिता
The Sanskrit word Prajñapramita literally translated signifies this book as "the Perfection of Transcendent Wisdom” (Perfect wisdom beyond ordinary limits / (Prajñ - प्रज्ञा wisdom and paramita - पारमिता perfect or perfection). Prajñapramita is a central concept in Mahayana Buddhism and its practice is believed to be the essential elements of the Bodhisattva Path. The practice of Prajñaparamita is described in the Prajñaparamita Sutras, which vary widely in length and written by different scholars. Tara and Prajnaparamita are both referred as mother of all Buddha, since Buddha is born from wisdom. The Dharma is classified as inferior and superior according to the disciple's grade. In Buddhism the disciples are being classified into four different stage of human being for example ordinary men; the stage of sainthood; Saint and Bodhisattva. In Buddhism, Dharma is referred to the teaching of Buddha, the Four Noble Truths, the Eightfold Noble Path, the three Marks of Existence, and other guidelines. The main motif is to achieve the freedom and liberation from suffering and understand the state of mind to realize the supreme happiness, the natural joy and nirvana. The happiness is classified as Ananda (Joy), Paramanda (Supreme Joy), Virmananda (Absence of Joy), and Sahajanand (Natural Joy).
Four Noble Truths is referred to the state of mind Dukkha (Suffering), Samudaya (the cause of suffering), Nirodha (free from suffering), Marga (a way to end suffering). The Four Noble Truths are formulated according to the ancient medical model as follows:-
1) There is an illness
2) The diagnosis – there is a cause of illness.
3) There is a possibility of a cure for the illness.
4) There is treatment for the illness. (The prescription that can relieves the illness)
The First Noble Truth:  Dukkha
Dukkha usually is translated as suffering. In life, we have illness, poverty, disease, old age and death. We cannot keep what we like and avoid what we do not like. The happiness we do enjoy is temporary and we do suffer is the universal truth
The Second Noble Truth: Samudaya
The cause of suffering is desire & illusions which is mainly because of ignorance. Wanting life, death, pleasure and things all lead to suffering
The Third Noble Truth :  Nirodha
There is a state of mind free from suffering. Suffering can get stopped if we can get rid of the state of mind, desire, cravings or hunger.
The Fourth Noble Truth:  Marga
There is a way to end suffering, we must end our cravings. Eightfold Path is the only noble way to end craving.
 The Eightfold Path
The eightfold Path is the teachings of the Prajñā- pāramitā Sutra:
the Triśatikā, Pañcaśatikā, Saptaśatikā, Astasāhasrikā, Sārdhadvisāhasrikā, Pañcavimśatisāhasrikā Astadaśasāhasrikā and Śatasāhasrikā Prajñāpārami Sūtra.
Truth is found through the Middle Way by following Eightfold Noble Path as stated below:
1) Right Viewpoint - Realizing the Four Noble Truths (samyag-dṛṣṭi / sammā-diṭṭhi). Correct thought by avoiding sharp desire - extreme desire to acquire, the wish to harm others and wrong views (thinking as if the actions have no effect or say I have no problem so there is no ways to end suffering etc.)
  2) Values- Commitment to mental value or expressing moral approval or moral philosophy (samyak-samkalpa, samma - samkalpa), correct speech avoid lying, harass speech (while having difference of opinion do not use harsh speech) and idle talk or rumor.
  3) Right Speech - To speak in a truthful way without harming others and to grow worse with unreasonable or wrong logic (Samyag-vāc, sammā-vācā). Correct actions: avoid killing, stealing and sexual misconduct
  4)  Actions–simple and healthy action, avoid action that would harm others (samyak-karmānta, sammā-kammanta). Correct livelihood: try to make a living with the above attitude of thought, speech and actions.
  5)  Livelihood - profession does not harm in any way oneself nor others, directly or indirectly -- to understand and develop genuine wisdom. (samyag-ājīva, sammā-ājīva).
(The following last three aspects refer mainly to the practice of meditation)
  6)  Effort - Correct effort, after the first real step we need joyful belief to continue or make an effort to improve the belief.(Perseverance --- samyag- vyayama,  sammā-vāyāma).
7)  Mindfulness - Correct mindfulness: try to be aware of the "here and now", instead of "there and then". Mental ability to see things with clear knowledge or the sense of one's personal or collective identity-consciousness (samyak - smṛti,  sammā - sati).
8)  Meditation - Correct Concentration: to keep a steady, calm and attentive state of mind where one reaches enlightenment and the ego gets disappear (samyak-samādhi, sammā-samādhi) universal emptiness or the Natural Joy.
Prajñāpāramitā Sutra is believed to be the highest form of Buddhist teaching and is classified into eight different categories as follows:
The Triśatikā, Pañcaśatikā, Saptaśatikā, Sārdhadvisāhasrikā, Astasāhasrikā, Astadaśasāhasrikā Pañcavimśatisāhasrikā and Śatasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramita Sūtra.
1)  Triśatikā Prajñāpārami Sūtra: 300 lines, the Diamond Sūtra or Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra
2)  Pañcaśatikā Prajñā- pāramitā Sūtra:  500 lines
3)  Saptaśatikā Prajñā- pāramitā Sūtra: 700 lines, the bodhisattva Manjushree’s exposition of Prajñāpāramitā
4)  Pārdhadvisāhasrikā Prajna -pāramitā Sūtra: 2500 lines, from the questions of Bodhisattva Suvikrāntavikrāmin
5)  AstasāhasrikāPrajñā- pāramitā Sūtra: 8000 lines
6)  Astadaśasāhasrikā Prajñā -pāramitā Sūtra: 18,000 lines
7)  Pañcavimśatisāhasrikā  Prajñā pāramitā Sūtra: 25,000 lines
8) Śatasāhasrikā Prajñā pāramitā Sutra: Mahāprajñā- pāramitā Sūtra.
According to Joseph Walser, Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā (25,000 line) Prajñāpāramitā Sutra and Śatasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sutra (100,000 lines) have a connection with Dharmaguptaka sect, while Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sutra (8000 lines) does not have any sect. ------ Williams, Paul. 2008 Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations.In addition to these, there are also other Prajñāpāramitā sūtras such as the Heart Sūtra (Prajñā pāramitā Hridaya), which exists in both 14-line and 25-line versions. Regarding the shorter texts, Edward Conze in his book "The Short Prajñāpāramitā Texts - 1973" writes, according to merit the Diamond Sūtra and the Heart Sūtra are renowned throughout the world. Both have been translated into many languages and have often been commented upon. Tantric versions of the Prajñāpāramitā literature were produced from the year 500 CE on.
Additionally, Prajñāpāramitā teachings are held by some Tibetan Buddhists to have been conferred upon Nāgārjuna by Nag raja, King of Nāgas, who had been guarding them at the bottom of the ocean. Tantric versions of the Prajñāpāramitā literature were produced from the year 500 CE on. Some of the ancient manuscripts are in the collection of Museums around the world. The following two collections are very important and authentic, The Heart Sutra (smallest of its kind having only 14 Stanzas in Sanskrit) is in New York Museum and The Perfection of wisdom (Tibetan Script having 8,000 stanza) from the collection of Royal Library Copenhagen.
There are more Prajnaparamita written in other languages found in many South Asian Countries Tibet, China, Japan, Korea, Hong Kong, Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam, Java, Sumatra, Bali, India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. Most of the Scholars are of the opium that the oldest and authentic manuscript is from Srilanka.
There are more Pranjaparamita manuscript also in the collection of National Achieve as well in Asha Saphu Kuthi, (Asha Archives) Kaiser Library and National Library.  Most of those collections are in small version or are of small volume but the one in Vikramshila Mahavihar, Thamel sounds to be more authentic and has more Stanzas (shlokas) and is nicely written with real golden ink (dated 344 NS / 1233 AD). Prajnaparamita from Patan, Rudra Varna Mahavihar is dated 216 NS/ 1105 AD and from Hiranya Varna Mahabihar is dated 336 NS / 1225 AD __ (Hem Raj Sakya and T.R. Vaidya, 1970 Medieval Nepal: Colophons and inscriptions, Kathmandu page 6).
The oldest Prajnaparamita manuscript (written during the period of Manipaldeva the king of Bengal 1020 AD) from the collection of Cambridge University is written in Ranjana script, highlights the origin of Ranjana Script from India. (From the collection of Indian Art Museum, Berlin –Dr. Regmi, Dinesh Chandra, Purlekhana Paricaya VS 2048/ 1991 An introduction to Nepalese Paleography - in Nepali -Page 102)
Conclusion:- There are many Vihars in and around Kathmandu Valley where they do have some collections of manuscripts written by different scholars and are displayed during the holy month GUNLA - August / September.
Vikramshila Mahavihar, Thambahi Simhakalpanagar
(Bhagwan Bahal, Thamel, Kathmandu)
Vikramshila Mahavihar, Thambhil, Simhakalpanagar is the ancient name of Bhagwan Bahal, Thamel Kathmandu. Mahavihar signify it to be a higher teaching institute same as a University, Thambahil signify it to be the monastery of high significance & pride. Simhakalpanagar denotes it as a separate city or town.
Bahi is the old form of Nepalese monastery usually located in a peaceful place far from the city settlement and are made in a plinth little above the level of the ground and are constructed in a very simple form. Originally Bahis were designed as a place for training, perching,copying the religious text; as a teaching institute; boarding for the students and shelter for the visiting monks. After the introduction of Vajrayan cult a new kind of monastery known as bahal were constructed (with some lavish decoration) in the city settlement to accommodate the married monks living together with their family.( Korn, Wolfgang, 1976 - The Traditional Archecture of Kathmandu Valley, Bibliotheca Himalayan Series 2, Ratna Pustak Bhandar, Kathmandu).
The Saharsha Prajnaparamita a rare collection of four volumes of highest Buddhist manuscript in this temple complex has a close relationship with Manjushree. The legendary Caravan to Lhasa leaded by Simha Sarth Bahu also does have main historical significance to its establishment. Some of the travel records made by scholars from India, Tibet and China also did mention about the glory of this temple during the 11th and 13th century; still lots of real facts are missing. The oldest available document related to this temple is of the visits of Pundit Atisa from India in the early 11th century (1041 A.D.).
In this short article I am trying my best effort to high light some facts to make understand a common reader about this ancient temple complex: lots of investigation and research need to be conduct to identify its past glory, as we are left with few documents.
Swayambhu Puran is one of the oldest manuscripts narrating the story of the evolution of Kathmandu Valley. According to the legend Kathmandu Valley was a lake surrounded by mountains. Kanakmuni Bodhisattva is believed to have thrown a lotus seed in the lake. A big lotus with thousand leaves blossomed in the center of lake that attracted visitors from around the globe. Manjushree Bodhisttva is believed to have visited this place and meditated in Phulchoki (Phullichho) and Jamachho (Jatamatroccho). He is believed to have drained the valley by cutting the edge of the hill with the divine sword. (Chovar being the only exit for all rivers in Kathmandu Valley and the black soil found everywhere in Kathmandu Valley does testify it to be a lake earlier). Manjushree is the Bodhistava of Divine wisdom representing the infinite and eternal wisdom of Buddha. Manjushree holds a sword in his right hand and a book of perfection (Prajnaparamita) in the left hand.
The first historical important evidence of Than Bahi is the visit of Pundit Atisha Shrijana (982- 1054) and spent one year studying Buddhist philosophy during 1041 - 42 AD. He was the head pundit (Principal) of Nalanda University and was invited by Tibetan king to visit Tibet to teach and revive Buddhism. On his way to Tibet he spent one year in Nepal (1041 - 42), most of his time was spent in Than Bahi and is believed to have studied the Buddhist philosophy and has written books in Sanskrit. (but the name of Prajnaparamita is not mentioned).
The Saharsha Prajnaparamita a rare collection of four volume of highest Buddhist manuscript in this temple complex has a close relationship with Manjushree. The legendary Caravan to Lhasa leaded by Simhsarth Bahu also does have main historical significance to its establishment.
Some of the travel record made by scholars from India Tibet and China also did mention about the glory of this temple during 11th and 13th century, still lots of real facts are missing.
Dharmashri Mitra, a renowned scholar from Vikramshila Vihar, Nalanda, India is believed to visit Nepal for advance study in Buddhism and Sanskrit in the early 13th Century. He did study in Thambahi, which clearly indicates the high importance of Thambhil and the similarity of the name Vikramshila indicates the name might have been given by him. “Traditional Architecture of Kathmandu Valley" by Wolfgang Korn, Ratna Pustak Bhandar, 1976 (Text by Purnaharsha Vajracharya).
Recent Archeological excavation in Nalanda got a new light about the existence of Vikramshila Vihar as one of the old teaching institution for higher study in Buddhism in the early first century BC.
A historical evidence of the restoration of the temple in 408NS/1287AD by Hari Singh during the resign of king Parthvendra Mall is being mentioned in the Toran, the semicircular wood archive kept in the main entrance of the temple. (It did have nice carvings of the image of Prajnaparamita which was stolen some 40 years ago; a new Toran is kept now as a replacement). The brick paving and the restoration of the temple complex in Thambahi was done by Hari Simha during the reign of king Parthivendra Malla is also mentioned in one of the stone inscription kept in National Archiev (The stone inscription no.173), Rajvamsi, Sanker Man 2027 VS in Kantipur Silalekh Suchi published by HMG National Archiev page 125.
Almost all Vihars in and around Kathmandu valley are being managed by the community of priest family either by Bajracharya or Sakya (Gristha Bhishu) family but this Vihar is exceptional where Pradhan family do control the management to run the day to day activities as well as various rituals during festivals. Simha Sartha Bahu is believed to have established Bhagwan Bahal and the entire daily rituals and activities during the festival are being controlled by the Pradhan family from Thamel, who believe themselves as the descendents of Simha Sartha Bahu.
We see Gaju on the roof tops of the religious buildings and temples; and chaitya in the Buddhist temple. Both the Hindu as well as Buddhist temple have Gaju (the roof top) a kalash (water Pot) design but the main shrine of Thambahi has a chaitya and a metallic mirror on the roof. A banner of white cloth along with a metallic belt hangs down from the metallic mirror (or chaitya). (Lucke, John K. S.J. Karunamaya 1986 page 474)
Saharsha Prajnaparamita
The four volume of Saharsha Prajnaparamita manuscript in the collection of Thambahi is dated Nepal Sambat 344 Margasira Pratipada (1223AD) is believed to have written by Jinashri Jnana and started by Manjushree.
Jinashri is supposed to get inspired by Manjushree and found an auspicious moment to start writing the manuscript, but felt asleep; Manjushree is believed to have started writing the first three pages with his finger. (The first three pages do have big script different than the remaining page).
When he woke up, found the auspicious moment already passed and was laminating; Manjushri came forward and instructed him to start writing without any disturbances as he has already started writing from the auspicious moment. This is a legend but we have no evidence regarding how long it did took to write all the four volume. The date NS 344 (1223 AD) might be the date it was completed or the date mentioned by someone else? King Pratap Mall (1641-1674 AD) and Queen Lalmati after visiting this temple wrote three stanzas appreciating the holy manuscript Laksavati Prajnaparamita (NS 780 /1658AD).
Pandit Hemraj Sakya in his Nepal Sanskritya Mulukha 1969 (Main entrance of the culture of Nepal) did mentioned this manuscript as Laksavati Prajnaparamita; This clearly indicate to have 100,000 stanza. It is believed that there were in total five volumes of Manuscripts. Tibetans did invade the temple and looted one volume which was recovered by the army and was deposited in Hanumandhoka Palace during King Pratap Mall’s period. Some people used to speak to have seen a manuscript having more similarity in script, being used during rituals in Sweat Bhairav temple in Hanumandhoka but there is no record in Hanumandhoka regarding this manuscript). 
There are 54,864 total lines in the four Volumes, (27 lines in one page - nine lines in three rows) four volume containing 2032 page (517 pages in Vol.1, 506 in Vol. II, 512 in Vol. III and 497 in Vol. IV). We have no idea regarding the total number of pages in the missing volume kept in Hanuman Dhoka.
If we guess 500 pages in the missing volume it will add 13,500 lines making total 68,364 lines. It is very interesting facts about numerology in both Hindu and Buddhist mythology that number nine plays a vital role, this is clearly understood in the layout of the page with three row containing nine lines totaling twenty seven lines, adding two and seven makes nine so each and every volume also do have the same count ending with nine. This does not happen if we have eight lines with three rows even though nine lines with four rows do fulfill these criteria but the size do not look nice. The size of the page is rectangular nine inches by eighteen inches written in real golden ink, which looks like a print rather than a hand written manuscript as the character looks uniform and looking at the nice and bright prints, it is hard to believe it being written long ago.
During GUNLAA, the Buddhist holy months (ninth months of Lunar Calendar) the four volumes are given to the Bajracharya of four renowned Vihars of Kathmandu to recite from top to bottom and are paid for doing so. During the last day of the display of the manuscript the National (Royal) Kumari from Hanumandhoka is being carried on a chariot to Thambhil for viewing the manuscript and the head Priest from Hanumandhoka used to recite few lines from the first page and the last page in the presence of Kumari marking the end of reciting the holy manuscript Prajnaparamita.
This used to be the only time when the manuscript is able to be view by public. (Now a days one can easily see it on paying fee that is used for the temple expenses). Many devotees from China, Tibet, India, Sikkim and Bhutan come visit Thambhi to pay to view and pay respect to this holy manuscript as it is believed to have written by the devine lord of learning Manjushree.
The Legendary story of the Caravan to Lhasa
A copy of ancient wall hanging (Poubha, Wilampau, Thangka painting, Scroll painting) narrating the story of the legendary caravan to Lhasa is being displayed in the main courtyard of Bhagwan Bahal during the festival of the holy month Gunla the ninth months according to the Nepali Lunar Calendar.
According to the legend (a non-historical or unverified story), a group of five hundred young businessmen left for a caravan to Lhasa. The group did selected Simhal, a merchant with rich knowledge, as their leader, this is how he got a new name Simhal Sarthabaha, as Sarthabaha is called for the leader of the group of merchant.
Walking through dense forest they came across river Brahmaputra. While crossing river the river they encountered an accident and were being rescued by five hundred young and exceptionally beautiful ladies. All members of the caravan were busy doing business and were enjoying with the young ladies as their wife, they did not thought of returning back home. Simhsarthabahu used to worship the family God Avalokiteshvara (Karunamaya) daily.
One day Simhsarthabahu was given the sight of Lord Avalokiteshvara (Karunamaya) while in meditation and worship. In the dream the Devin Lord Avalokiteshvara told him that they are being under captive of the devils (The man eater) and told him to leave the city as soon as possible as it was a bewitched Island. He was instructed to go to the north side of the city to check a big compound surrounded by tall walls like a well, where they used to throw the skeletons.
Avalokiteshvara also did promise to help them cross the river. He went there and was able to climb a tree, and saw lots of human skeletons behind the tall walls, where they were not forbidden to visit. He got convinced himself about the dream after visiting the northern side of the city. He made the plan to get an escape from the evil eyes of the damsels whom they mistakenly thought of their beloved wives.
He was able to get convinced his friends about the instruction of the divine Lord and made a plan to live the bewitched land as soon as possible. They left their home in the middle of the night when their wives were fast asleep and came close to the Brahmaputra River. Simhsarthabahu did worship the divine Lord and a flying horse appeared. The horse instructed all them to get a ride and warned them not to look behind while crossing the river and enchant the Triratna Mantra. When the she devils wok up, they could not find the young merchants sleeping next to them. They were flying across the river and started laminating and requesting them to return back home. All members except Simhsarthabahu looked behind and were under the captive of the she devils and were taken back to the other side of the river. Simhsarthabahu was the only person who did not look behind, and did not forget to enchant the Mantra of Triratna, so was able to get back home leaving behind all his friends under the captive of the wretched women (she devil). The chief devil, wife of Simhsarthabahu followed him and disguised as a young and exceptionally beautiful lady came to the court with a baby on her lap claiming herself to be the wife of Simhsarthabahu. Simhsarthabahu did try to convince the king that she is a man eater and denied to accept them as his wife and son.
The king then kept her in the palace as he was attracted with the exceptional beauty of the lady. In the middle of the night she called all her companions and started killing the members of the Royal family and the staff. Next day when the palace door did not opened Simhsarthabahu entered the palace climbing through a ladder. He was no more able to find any body but the human skeleton scattered all over the palace court yard. He could not found any of the Royal family members in the palace as all were being killed and eaten by the she devils. He found the human skeletons scattered around the palace and saw the she devils sleeping around the courtyard. With the Devin sword he is believed to have killed all the Dankinis except his wife who did beg pardon for her life.
After being pardoned from her life she is being ordered to make a solemn vow to protect the entire community and in return she also made a proposal to protect the community least there be no opening in the roof top of the buildings. This is why even today the Pradhans from this locality do not have open roof-tops in their houses.
She was then asked which portion of the rice she wants to have- the first, middle or the last. She spoke to have the first one thinking herself as senior so this is how she got the sticky water (Jati). This is how even today the sticky water (Jati) is being poured to the image of Jatikwa Ajima, before reaching the rice bowl to Garud Bhagwan.  She has made a vow to protect the entire community; she also made a proposal least there be no openings in the rooftops of the buildings. This is why even today the Pradhans from the locality do not have open rooftops in their houses.
Simsharthabahu was nominated as the leader of the community as all members of the Royal family were killed by the she divil. This is how he got a new name Garud literally meaning army chief and later on was able to became the king and called Garudjuju. (Pradhan, Bhuban Lal, 2047, Kathmandu Upatyeka ka Chirka Mirka Page -72 
Simhasarthbahu donated land and is believed to have established Thambahi in his home town; with the wealth he earned from Lhasa (the traders usually bring Gold from Tibet).
Later on being the chief of the army was able to become the king and got coroneted to the thrown so called Garud juju and was coroneted as the king. Later on with his spiritual power and intellectual knowledge, he gained popularity as a form of Divine God – Dipankara  Garud Bhagwan. His wife also is honored as a divine god Ajima, the proctector Goddess (Jatika Ajima). Even these days the sticky water (Jati) is being poured to the image of Ajima (Jatika Ajima), before reaching the rice bowl to Garud Bhagwan.
The main image of Bhagwan Bahal which is known as Garujuju or Garud Bhagwan, is believed to be the image of Simha Sartha Bahu. Even today Pradhans from Thambahi do not visit Lhasa as they belive themselve the descendant of Simha Sartha Bahu, because they are scared of being attracted by the she devils as revenge.  

Baidyo Boayagu
The ninth months of Lunar calendar (it starts from the dark moon night of Festival of light) so called GUNLAA is being celebrated as the holy month by the Newar Buddhist community in Kathmandu Valley. During this festival antiques, Images of Dipankar, images of different God and Goddess, Paubha paintings (Wilampau, scroll painting, Thanka painting), traditional clothing’s are displayed in the courtyard of Buddhist shrines - Baha and Bahi and is called Baidyah Boayagu.
A copy of ancient wall hanging (Paubha, Wilampau, Thanka painting, and Scroll painting) being displayed in the main court of Thamel, during the holy months of Gunlaa narrates the legendary story of the Voyage to Lhasa, being leaded by Simhasarthbahu.
Professor Siegfried Linhard did published an article introducing a painting 11.44 meter long and 0.55 meter wide with 80 frames each with legend story text in Nepali script and the language Newari illustrating the Simhalavadan from the collection of The Museum of Indian Art, Berlin (Heritage of the Kathmandu Valley: Preceding of an International Conference in Lubek, June 1985 edited by Niels Gutschow and Ayiel Michaels. Nepalica 4 Sankt, 1987 s 49-53)
Professor Todd Lewis of the college of Holy Cross in Massatuetse, USA also published a paper on the localization of Simhalasarthabahu Avadana- Chicago Journal- History of Religion volume 33 no.2, November 1993 page 135-160 (Tib-Trade-and-Domestication-of Simhalasarth-Avadan).

Garuda Bhagwan (Garudjuju)

Sartha Bahu is used to identify the leader of the merchants, in some of the early texts as well as in the poem from Kalidasa in the early 11th century. The Poubha (scroll painting) being displayed in the main court of Thamel, during the holy months of Gunlaa narrates the legendary story of the Voyage to Lhasa, being lead by Simha Sartha Bahu.
This is how Simhala the leader of the Caravan got a new name Simhalsarthabaha later called upon as Simhsarthabahu.The main image of the Bhagwan Bahal is known as Garujuju or Garud Bhagwan, is believed to be the image of Simhsarthabahu. After all royal family were killed he became the leader or say chief of the Army so got a new name Garuda and once he became the king again called Garudjuju.(Pradhan, Bhuvan Lal,2047, Kathmandu Upatyakaka kehi sanskritic chhirka mirka -some notes on the culture identity of Kathmandu valley in Nepali page 72). Simha Sartha Bahu is believed to have established Bhagwan Bahal and the entire daily rituals and activities during the festival are being controlled by the Pradhan family from Thamel, who believe themselves as the descendants of Simha Sartha Bahu. Simhsarthabahu is mentioned as one of the previous life of Buddha in the 16th chapter of Gunakarandavyaha.
In one of the chronological history (Bansabali) from Kaiser Library the story of lhasa caravan was mentioned during the Regine of King Gunakamadeva (NS 107-110/ 987-990 AD) and in some writtings he is mentioned as to belong to the period of Singhketu descendent of Gunakamadeva.
Atisa the renowned scholar from Vikramshila Vihar did spent one year (1041/42 AD) in Nepal before departing to Tibet, most of his time was spent in Thambahi but he did not mentioned about Garud Bhagwan.
The monastery in Itubahal is believed to have established by Bhashkardeva(NS165-167 / 1045-1047 AD) and later on got renovated by Kesh Chandra brother in law of Simhsarthabahu (Bhaskardeva sanskarita Kesh Chandra krita parabrata Mahavihar from the stone inscription of Itumbahal).
We can thus conclude that Simhsarthabahu belong to a period after Bhashkardeva(NS 165-167 / 1045-1047 AD) or after Kalidasa (early 11th century).
Simha Sartha Bahu is believed to have established Bhagwan Bahal and the entire daily rituals and activities during the festival are being controlled by the Pradhan family from Thamel, who believe themselves as the descendants of Simha Sartha Bahu. They do not visit Lhasa as they were scared of getting revenge by the she-devil from Lhasa.
Both Simhsarthabahu is given equal honor as the form of diven God by the Tibetan people calling him the Jewel Trader Bhagwan (Chhong Nurbu Saange or Tsongpon Norbu Sangpo - Chhong meaning Trader; Tsongpon meaning Leader of Traders; Nurbu meaning Jewel and Saange or Sangpo meaning Bhagwan). There is a chorten (Temple) in Zhugong near Lhasa called Simhsarthabahu Chorten and a shrine of his wife in Jokhang that contain the image of his wife. (Newar Tibetain Trade and the Domestication page 152)

Vikramshil Mahavihar, Thambahil, Simhakalpanagar
        (Bhagwan Bahal, Thamel, Kathmandu)
                   - Damodar Prasad Pradhan
            E-mail: damodar_04@yahoo.com  

Vikramshil Mahavihar, Thambahil, Simhakalpanagar is the ancient name of Bhagwan Bahal, Thamel Kathmandu. Mahavihar signifies it to be a higher teaching institute, same as a University; Thambahil signifies it to be the monastery of high significance and pride. Simhakalpanagar denotes it as a separate city or town itself. Lots of investigation and research need to be conducted to identify its past glory. We are left but with a few documents.Swayambhu Puran is one of the oldest manuscripts narrating the story of the evolution of Kathmandu Valley. According to the legend, Kathmandu Valley was a titanic lake surrounded with mountains. Kanakmuni Bodhisattwa is believed to have thrown a lotus seed in the lake. A big lotus flower with a thousand leaves blossomed in the center of the lake that attracted visitors from around the globe. Manjushree Bodhisttwa is believed to have visited this place and meditated in Phulchowki (Phullichho) and Jamacho (Jatamatroccho). He is believed to have drained the valley by cutting the edge of the hill with his divine sword. (Chobhar being the only exit for all rivers in Kathmandu Valley and the black soil found everywhere in Kathmandu Valley does testify it to be a lake earlier). Manjushree is the Bodhistawa of Divine Wisdom representing the infinite and eternal intellect of Buddha. Manjushree holds a sword in his right hand and a book of perfection (Prajnaparamita) in the left hand. The first historical important evidence of Than Bahi is the visit of Pundit Atisha Shrijana (982 - 1054 A.D.) who did spend one year studying the Buddhist philosophy during 1041/42 A.D. He was the head pundit (Principal) of Nalanda University and was invited by the Tibetan king to visit Tibet to teach and revive Buddhism. On his way to Tibet he spent one year in Nepal (1041 - 42); most of his time was spent in Than Bahi. He is believed to have studied the Buddhist philosophy and has written books in Sanskrit. (But he did not mention the name of Prajnaparamita). Source?

Dharmashri Mitra, a renowned scholar from Vikramshil Vihar, Nalanda, India is believed to visit Nepal for advance study in Buddhism and Sanskrit in the early 13th Century. He did study in Thambahil, which clearly indicates the high importance of Thambhil and the similarity of the name Vikramshil indicates the name might have been given by him. “Traditional Architecture of Kathmandu Valley" by Wolfgang Korn, Ratna Pustak Bhandar, 1976 (Text by Purna Harsha Bajracharya).

Recent Archeological excavation in Nalanda got a new light about the existence of Vikramshil Vihar as one of the old teaching institutions for higher study in Buddhism in the early first century B.C.  A historical evidence of the restoration of the temple in 408 N.S./1287A .D. by Hari Singh during the resign of King Parthvendra Malla is being mentioned in the Toran, the semi circular wood archive kept in the main entrance of the temple. (It did have nice carvings of the image of Prajnaparamita which was stolen some 40 years ago; a new Toran is kept now as a replacement.)

The Saharsha Prajnaparamita a rare collection of four volumes of highest Buddhist manuscript in this temple complex has a close relationship with Manjushree. The legendary Caravan to Lhasa leaded by Simha Sarth Bahu also does have main historical significance to its establishment. Some of the travel records made by scholars from India, Tibet and China also did mention about the glory of this temple during the 11th and 13th century; still lots of real facts are missing. The oldest available document related to this temple is of the visits of Pundit Atisa from India in the early 11th century (1041 A.D.). In this short article I am trying my best effort to highlight some facts to make understand a common reader about this ancient temple complex.

Sartha Bahu is used to identify the leader of the merchants, in some of the early texts as well as in the poem from Kalidasa in the early 11th century. The Poubha (scroll painting) being displayed in the main court of Thamel, during the holy months of Gunlaa narrates the legendary story of the Voyage to Lhasa, being lead by Simha Sartha Bahu. Simha Sartha Bahu is believed to have established Bhagwan Bahal and the entire daily rituals and activities during the festival are being controlled by the Pradhan family from Thamel, who believe themselves as the descendents of Simha Sartha Bahu. Almost all Vihars in and around Kathmandu Valley are being managed by the community of the priest family either by the Bajracharya or the Shakya (Gristha Bhishu) family, but this Vihar is exceptional where the Pradhan family do control the management to run the day-to-day activities as well as various rituals during festivals. We see the Gajus on the rooftops of the religious buildings and temples and chaityas in the Buddhist temple. Both the  Buddhist as well as the Hindu temple has the Gaju (the pinnacle) and a Kalash (the holy water vase) design but the main shrine of Thambahi has a chaitya and a metallic mirror on the spire. A banner of white cloth along with a metallic belt hangs down from the metallic mirror (or chaitya). (Locke, John K., S.J. Karunamaya 1986 page 474) 

Saharsha Prajnaparamita

The four volume of Saharsha Prajnaparamita manuscript in the collection dated Nepal Sambat 344 Margasira Pratipada (1223 A.D.) is believed to have written by Jinashri Jnana and started by Manjushree. Jinashri is supposed to get inspired by Manjushree and found an auspicious moment to start writing the manuscript, but felt asleep. Manjushree is believed to have started writing the first three pages with his fingers. (The first three pages do have big scripts different than the remaining pages). When he woke up, found the auspicious moment already passed and was laminating; Manjushri came forward and instructed him to start writing without any disturbances as he has already started from the auspicious moment. This is a legend and we have no evidence regarding how long it took to write all the four volumes. The date N.S. 344 (1223 A.D.) might be the date it was completed or the date mentioned by someone else? King Pratap Malla (1641-1674) and Queen Lalmati after visiting this temple wrote three stanzas appreciating the holy manuscript. Laksavati Prajnaparamita (N.S. 780, 1658 A.D.). During GUNLAA, the Buddhist holy month (the ninth month of the Lunar Calendar) the four volumes are given to the Bajracharyas of four renowned Vihars of Kathmandu to recite from the top to bottom and are paid for doing so. This used to be the only time when the manuscript is able to be view by the general public. (Now-adays one can easily see it on paying a certain fee that is used for the temple expenses). During the last day of the display of the manuscript, the National (Royal) Kumari from Hanuman Dhoka is being carried on a chariot to Thambhil for viewing the manuscript and the Head Priest from Hanuman Dhoka used to recite a few lines from the first page and the last page in the presence of Kumari marking the end of reciting the holy manuscript Prajnaparamita. Pandit Hem Raj Sakya in his Nepal Sanskritya Mulukha 1969 (Main Entrance of the Culture of Nepal) did mention this manuscript as Laksavati Prajnaparamita. This signifies to have 100,000 stanzas. We have no idea regarding the total number of pages in the missing volume kept in Hanuman Dhoka. Tibetans did invade the temple and looted one volume which was recovered by the army and was deposited back in Hanuman Dhoka Palace during King Pratap Malla's period. Some people used to speak to have seen a manuscript having more similarity in scripts, being used during the rituals in Swet Bhairav Temple in Hanuman Dhoka; but there is no record in Hanuman Dhoka regarding this manuscript). 

There are 54,864 total lines in the Four Volumes, (27 lines in one page - nine lines in three rows) four volumes containing 2,032 pages (517 pages in Vol.1, 506 in Vol. II, 512 in Vol. III and 497 in Vol. IV). If we guess 500 pages in the missing volume it will add 13,500 lines making a total of 68,364 lines. It is a very interesting fact about numerology in both Hindu and Buddhist mythologies that number nine plays a vital role. This is clearly understood in the layout of the page with three rows containing nine lines totaling twenty-seven lines, adding two and seven makes nine; so each and every volume also does have the same count ending with nine. This does not happen if we have eight lines with three rows even though nine lines with four rows do fulfill these criteria. The size does not look nice. The size of the page is rectangular, nine inches by eighteen inches written in real golden ink, which looks like a print rather than a hand written manuscript as the characters look uniform and looking at the nice and bright prints, it is hard to believe being written long ago.

The Legendary Story of the Caravan to Lhasa & Baidyo Boyagu

The ninth month of the Lunar Calendar (it starts from the dark moon night of the Festival of Lights) so called GUNLAA is being celebrated as the holy month by the Newar Buddhist community in Kathmandu Valley. During this festival antiques, images of Dipankar, images of different Gods and Goddesses, Poubha Paintings (Wilampau scroll painting, Thangka painting), traditional clothings are displayed in the courtyards of the Buddhist shrines - Baha and Bahi and is called Baidyo Boyagu. A copy of ancient wall hanging (Poubha, Wilampau, Thangka painting, Scroll painting) narrating the story of the legendary caravan to Lhasa is being displayed in the main courtyard of Bhagwan Bahal. According to the legend (a non-historical or unverified story), a group of five hundred young businessmen left for a caravan to Lhasa. The group did select Simha Sartha Bahu, a merchant with rich knowledge, as their leader. While crossing the River Bhramputra, they encountered an accident and were being rescued by five hundred young and exceptionally beautiful ladies. All members were busy in commerce and were enjoying with the young ladies as their wives; they did not think of returning home. One day Simha Sartha Bahu was given the dicine sight of Lord Avalokiteshwar (White Karunamaya) while in meditation and worship. In the dream Lord Avalokiteshwar told him that they are being under the captive of the devils (the man eaters) and told him to leave the city as soon as possible as it was a bewitched island. He was instructed to go to the northern side of the city to check a big compound surrounded by tall walls like a well, where they used to throw the skeletons. Avalokiteshwar also did promise to help them cross the river with a flying white horse and instructed not to look behind while crossing the river. He was able to climb a tree and saw lots of human skeletons behind the tall walls, where they were not forbidden to visit. He got convinced himself about the dream after visiting the northern side of the city. He made the plan to get an escape from the evil eyes of the damsels whom they mistakenly thought of their beloved wives. After getting their friends convinced, they planned to fetch an escape and went to the riverside in the middle of the night when their wives were fast asleep. He worshiped the Family God Avalokiteshwar (Karunamaya) and a flying horse appeared. All members got a ride over the horse and were flying over the river.  While they were crossing the river, all ladies woke up and started flying over the river and those who looked behind were being taken back to the other side of the river.  Simha Sartha Bahu was the only person who did not look behind, so was able to get back home leaving behind all his friends who looked behind and were under the captive of the she devils. Simha Sartha Bahu donated land and is believed to have established Thambahi in his hometown; with the wealth he earned from Lhasa (the traders usually bring gold from Tibet). Later on, with his spiritual power he gained popularity as Dipankar and became the leader of the entire community. The main image of Bhagwan Bahal which is known as Garujuju or Garud Bhagwan, is believed to be the image of Simha Sartha Bahu. The Dankini, his wife came to the court for justice with a baby on her lap claiming herself as his spouse. Finally he had to admit her as his life-partner. He then asked her which portion of the rice she wants to have --- the first, the middle or the last. She replied the first one thinking herself as senior. She is also honored as a divine Goddess Ajima, after her spiritual power and knowledge. This is how even today the sticky water (Jati) is being poured to the image of Jatikwa Ajima, before reaching the rice bowl to Garud Bhagwan.  She has made a vow to protect the entire community; she also made a proposal least there be no openings in the rooftops of the buildings. This is why even today the Pradhans from the locality do not have open rooftops in their houses and being the descendant of Simha Sartha Bahu, they do not visit Lhasa because they are scared of being attracted by the she devils as a square revenge.  

Reference Books (for further studies):

Anderson, Mary M., The Festivals of Nepal, Rupa Publication, India 1971

Bajracharya, Badri Ratna, Kathmandu 1986, Buddhism in Nepal

Chattopadhyaya, Alka 1967 Atisha & Tibet, Moti Lal Banarsi Das, Delhi

Conze, Edward 1970,   Buddhist Thoughts in India, University of Michigan Press

    --------- Preliminary Notes on a Prajnaparamita Manuscript Journal of Royal Asiatic Society, Volume 82 Issue 1-2, 2011

Dass, Sarat Chandra, Indian Pundits in the Land of Snow, Asiatic Society of India 1893

David J. Kalupahana, A History of Buddhist Philosophy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu

David N. Gellner, Niels Gutschow. Bijaya Basukala (Illustrator), The Nepalese Chaitya

David Snellgrove 1987 Indo-Tibetan Buddhism Shambhala, Boston

Deb Priya Barma, Atisha Dipankar Srijana: Eyes of Asia

Keshar Lal Shrestha 2007 Legends of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal Bhasha Academy

Locke, John K. S.J 1980 Karunamaya: The Cult of Avalokiteswar

----- 1985 Buddhist Monasteries of Nepal.

------Baha and Bahis of Kathmandu Valley, Sahayogi Press, Kathmandu.

Lienhard Snegfried 1988, Nepalese Manuscripts Part 1 Newari and Sanskrit

Lopez, Don Jr. (edited) 1997, Atisha’s Journey to Tibet

Malalasekera, G. P. (Editor), Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Ceylon 1963

Pal, Pratapaditya 1974, The Arts of Nepal

Paul, Williams, 1989 Mahayan Buddhism. Routledge London & New York

Regmi, Dilli Raman, Inscriptions of Ancient Nepal

Shakya, Hem Raj N.S. 1098 (1978) Swayambhu Mahachaitya

Dr. Shrestha, Uma Editor, Newa Vijnana (A Journal of Newar Studies)

Bajracharya, Dhana Bajra, 1973   Lichhavikalin Abhilekh INAS

Kathmandu Bajracharyas, Goutam 1987  

Heritage of Kathmandu Valley, Bajracharya, Ratna Bahadur N.S. 1095 (1974 A.D.)  

Guru Mandal Rachana wa Prajnaparamitaya Artha Sahitam, Lalitpur (in Nepal Bhasha)

Bajracharya, Ratna Kaji, 1998 Yen Deya Chaitya (in Nepal Bhasha)

Wright, Daniel Ed.1983 (1st Published 1877) Nepal - History of the Country & People         

Yoshizaki Kasjumi 1979 A Critical Study of Saddharmamala

Yoshizaki Kasjumi 2006 Kathmandu Valley as a Water Pot, Kurokami Library, Kumamoto, Japan

Books related to Prajnaparamita (The Korean Buddhist Canon: A Descriptive Catalogue edited by R. Lanceaster, Berkley 1979)             

Bajra Chhedika Pranjaparamita (The Diamond Sutra) edited by M. Muller, Oxford 1881

Andtasaharika Pranjaparamita Vol. 1, R. Mittras in the Bibliotheca Indica 1888

Satashasrika Pranjaparamita 100,000 verses 12 volumes edited Bibliotheca Indica 1902 - 1913 Translated in Tibetan during the early 9th century by Jianmitra

Pranjaparamita Rhidaya Sutra (Heart Sutra) edited by M. Muller, Oxford 1912

Astadasasahasrika Pranjaparamita 18,000 lines 3 Volumes edited by Bidya Binod 1927 (Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India No. 32 & 69

Panchabimsatishasrika Pranjaparamita 25,000 lines 3 volumes edited by N. Dutta (Collected from Tibetan Scripts), Calcutta Oriental Series 1934

Dasasahasrika Pranjaparamita Volume 1 (translated from Tibetan) S.  Konow, Oslo 1941

Pranjaparamita Rhidaya Sutra (Heart Sutra) edited by E. Conze in JRAS 1948

Perfection of Wisdom in 8,000 lines written in Tibetan Scripts, Library of Copenhagen (E. Conze 1952)  

The Prajnaparamita Literature by Edward Conze, Manton, The Hagues 1960

Preliminary notes on Pranjaparamita - Manuscript E. Conze Journal of Royal Asiatic Society Vol. 82 (Issue 1-2) 2011

Patashashrik Pranjaparamita (Hsuan-Tsang describes about the Perfection of Wisdom with 100,000 lines during his visit India/Nepal 659-663)

Panchavimansahsahrika Prajnaparamita Sutra (Nepalese Manuscripts), The Perfection of Wisdom with 25,000 lines is in the collection of Cambridge University Museum.

The shortest Prajnaparamita with 14 lines written in Sanskrit is in the collection of the Library of Copenhagen


Wednesday, April 11, 2012


http://controversialhistory.blogspot.com/2011/07/is-tirupati-balaji-temple-buddist.html#.T4YIxVFYvfh

Controversies in History
Lie wellstruct is as Good as Truth
TOPIX
Is Tirupati Balaji Temple a Buddhist Temple
So many scholars, from all sides of the spectrum have many theories on why there may be previous structure at the present Tirupati temple. Let us see ourselves the evidences.
We are not going to any religious discussion or philosophical discussion, we will stick to the main point, was there a Buddhist shrine at the site of Venkateshwara temple at Tirupati.      

Buddhist Temple
Indology scholar Romila Thapar told -Dig underneath every Hindu temple, there will be a Buddhist temple. If we take example of Adil shah of Bhamani Dynasty, his court poet farishta tells the king demolished more than 300 major temples in karnataka and built mosques there, even in this case we cannot apply Romila Tapar and say dig underneath every mosque that adil shah built, you will find a temple, because many mosque are there which were not built demolishing a temple. The Romilla Tapar comment is pure Indologist leftist leaning. Here she is not providing any proof's, but plain rhetoric.
karthikeya( Murugan) temple. 
One more claim put forth by Dravidian scholars of tamil nadu. Originally it was a Karthikeya temple and was converted to a vishnu temple. Bala means young unmarried same as Kumar(sanskrit) and Kumaran(Tamil) , which denotes to karthikeya ,but in tamil version eventhough he is called kumaran, murugan is married to Devyani(deva army) and valli ( tribal girl). So this argument is defeated there , that the murugan can be called balaji. More than that In South he is called Venkateshwara (Lord of Venkata) and only in north India he is called Balaji and in recent times.
1)  First they have to prove that there was a Murugan worship was prevalent in the first millienia in tamil nadu and temples are built for murugan, For this we dont have a answer.
2)  Second Pallava were ruling in Kanchi upto 9th century AD and tamil kings areas were below the pallava region. 
3)  Third Tirupathi came under Banas and Nolambas for most part in the first milliena. Both being Kannada Dynasties. So we dont see any murugan temple being built. Since the Kannada/ Tulu version of Karthikeya is Shanmuga. If it was a karthikeya temple, then the kannada kings might have called it shanmuga temple.
4)  Fourth and most important Tamil literature right from Sangam works have always claimed that Tirupathi (Thiruvengadam)  lies north of Tamil Nadu boundary. 
So Tamil Scholars dont see much credit in Dravidian scholars argument that Tirupati is a Karthikeya or Murugan temple. Indology and Dravidian scholars who have worked tirelessly to undermine authentic Indian history seems have shot themselves in their foot here.

Temple Structure
First temples in south India were built in 4th century AD in Karnataka and Andhra. Even in 6th century AD, most of the temples built were Rock cut temples, not standalone temples that we have today. All the early temples like Mamallapuram of Pallavas are also rock cut temples. So a hill temple Hindu or Buddhist standalone in Thirupathi is unthinkable.
When was Tirupati temple built?.

Puranas 
The Purana Accounts are legendary and is not helpful in finding the probable date of the temple. Puranas concentrate how Vishnu came voluntarily to take his place there. Varaha temple at the foothills of Tirupati predates venkateshwara temple at the top. The only account relevant here is Tondaman (pallava) started the worship of vishnu here. This Thondaman assisted his brother(Akasa Raja) in administration. Thondaiman had a foster daughter in Tirupati and she was married to venkatesa. After the death of Akasa Raja (left a young prince), he and his nephew fought and tondiaman felt very weak ,so got the weapons from venkateswara . The war ended Indecisively and the country was divided into two. The one closer to Vengadam (Tirupati) was given to thondaman and the other farther away given to his nephew. Tondaiman built the temple and started the festivals. This Tondaman lived in Kaliyuga. There is a separate Thondaiman dynasty post 12th century AD. But Dravidian scholars want to identify Thondaiman as Pallava.

Sangam Literature
We don't comes across any mention of temple in the vengadam (Tirupati) hills. Tirupati was on northside of the boundary of Tamil speaking region. Beyond this region vadukar lived with Thirayan as the chief and people spoke a language not understandable to Tamils. So no help in determining when the temple was built. 
Alwar (Bakti tradition)
One Alwar called poigai Alwar gives around 12 references to temple at Tirupati and Vishnu as presiding deity. Poigai Alwar wrote Naalayira Divyap Prabhandham on the vishnava places. In some places he refers to Ilam kumara koman (May Indicate Subramanya, but the reference here is young fellow). Alwar Bhutan refers to Tirupati and Presiding deity in around 8 references in his works. Pey Alwar also refers to Tirupati. These three alwars considered worshipping vishnu with Vedic rituals as the supreme form of worshp. Some refer to the deity as ardhanari, which refers to shiva. We have to come to the conclusion here, eventhough the deity is referred as ardhanari, it may not be peculiar to shiva alone at those times. And the same goes for Ilam kumaran , may not be peculiar to subhramanya. Even though we come across stray references , we are given solid references to prove the diety is vishnu, so we should not vacillate in our judgement that the deity is not vishnu. Ardhanari shows that the temple is equally important for Lakshmi. So all the early Alwars refer to Tirupati and Vishnu deity. Tirumalisai (Bhakti sara - Sanskrit) contemproary of these three alwars wrote that he has seen all faiths and only found vishnu as great. Now we have to date the Alwars ,which is again  controversial. That requires a whole article. But let us try. There is a reference to vairamegha in the early alwars work, that seemed to be identified as Rastrakuta Dantidurga, contemproary of Nandivarma pallava. But the identification needs to be proved. Commentator of Alangara kranta named Yapparungulam belonging to 11th to 12th century AD claims he is desciple of Poigaiyar (poigai alwar)and quotes two stanzas from the authors work. Tirumalisai is dated to 11th century AD. But one thing we can say is all the Alwars were born after the temple were built which was already famous.

Silapatikaram
Silapadigaram a buddhist work tells that Tirupati is Vishnu temple. In this story a Brahman of Mangadu in Malainadu goes to Tirupati and Srirangam and sings in praise of Vishnu.The Tirupati is said to be so famous that people from west coast also went to the temple. So this Buddhist epic tells very clearly that presiding diety of Tirupati is Vishnu. Dating of cilapathikaram is controversial, we have already seen in a separate article.
So let us find who this thondaman is? 
We find from Sangam literature sources that Vengadam changed hands from kalvar chieftain pulli to Tondaman before the time of pandyan king who won a great victory in Talaiyalanganam. The King who won in Talaiyalanganam is mentioned in Sinnamanur plates dated to 11th century AD and kings mentioned just before this date. The same source says Tondaman ruling from pavattirai (Nellore Dist, AP). We have one more Thondaman Ilam Thirayan ruling in Kanchi. Now the Foster Daughter born to the Tondaman is not legitimate and he is said to have found her on the hills and later finds out that she is his daughter. This has been equated with Naga princess story of karikala. But Karikala meets Naga princess in outskirts of Kaveripattanam, not in Tirupati hills. So we cannot identify Tondaman with karikalan. But there is a pallava story of Pallava marrying naga princess in an inscription in kanchi as well. Perumban Arupadai which gives specific details about Kanchi Vishnu temple of Thondaman Ilam Thiraiyan is silent on Tirupati or association of thiraiyan with Tirupati, so we cannot link these two stories. Thiraiyan had a brother and nephew. He fought with the Nephew and uncle for the throne. Alwars talking about war between southern king (pandya) and Northern ruler (pallava).
The Tirumangai Alwar says that the Thiraiyan kanchi was occupied by one vairamegan. The vairamegan is suposed to be Rastrakutas. Two Rastrakutas occupied the capital one is Dandidurga and other Govinda II. This story of fight between brother and Nephew looks similar to Kampavarman pallava(relative of Western Gangas) and his kid brother Nrptunga Pallava(relative of Pandyas and also Rastrakutas). This story can reveal the struggle between the last war of succession in Pallava Dynasty before Aditya Karikalan  unsurpassed the throne.

Inscriptions
Uttaramallur by Nandivarman pallava II is the first inscription to refer to vengadam, there is no temple here still. The hill is just mentioned as Vengada ,not Thiruvengada (Sri Vengada). 
In 8th and 9th centuries AD, Many Visnu temples near Tirupati received Grants from many kings, but none was given to Tirupati temple. But the same can be said about Buddhist or Murugan or Jain Temple , Kings at that time were secular, so there should be a grants even if it is any of the other holy places.
In TTD gives eleven inscription of pallavas. Earliest belong to Dandivikramadeva , which may correspond to period 833-34AD.
Even through many scholars claim many dates for Tirupathi temple construction, First Inscription in Tirupati temple is by Dandivarman pallava (830AD). So the Temple has to be built during that time.

Tirupati Debate
Point is the debate about Tirupati is not just today ,but it is there right from 11th century AD. Ramanuja made arguments to kings to establish the primacy of Vishnu in Tirupati. For this we have to establish the date of Ramanuja.

Date of Ramanuja

There was a Vaishnavite Devotee called as Nadamuni. He belongs to Mannarkovil in south Arcot district. He spent most of the time in the village and sometimes in Kurukaikkavalappan Kovil, a nearby village, which was just mile after the chola capital Gangaikonda Cholapuram (Named so,After Western Ganga Territories were absorbed into chola empire in 1022AD). when he was in Kurukaikkavalappan Kovil village, he heard vaishnavite devotees singing a song in praise of Vishnu, which was Tiruvoimoli of Nammalvar. He asked the pilgrim to repeat the verses. But the pilgrim knew only ten lines of the 1000 lines poem. So he went in search of the work. He reached Kumbakonam, he got nothing. So he went to Tirunagari in Tirunelveli the native place of Nammalvar. His attempts were futile there also. So he sat under the tree of temple ,where Nammalvar is supposed to have practiced Yoga. He chanced on someone who was direct disciple of Nammalvar and got the full work. He brought the work to srirangam and revived the festival started by Thirmangai Alvar. Having done this, he went on pilgrimage to all the vaishnava shrines in the country. He went to Abhobilam and Tirupati. He went back to Tirupati as he welt the pooja arrangements were not proper. His grandson Alavandar Yamunait- turaivar or Yamunacharya. For the arrangements to become proper, he asked one of his disciples to volunteer to stay in the hill and conduct the worship in proper way. One of his grandsons Thirumalai Nambi volunteered to do the service. Thirumali Nambi settled down there and planted a garden and took upon himself to deliver water for the diety daily from a waterfall little distant from the temple. One of the young sisters that Thirumalai nambi took with him was married to one Kesava Somayaji of Sriperumbudur. The offspring of this marriage was Ramanuja. Ramanuja's date of birth, according to the traditional account of his life,is Kali 4118, A. D. 1017. The other date given of course is Saka 937 bya chronogram. Going by the story we have here ,the date has to be at the fag end of 11th century AD. The same sources give date of Nadamuni to 3684, which would mean A. D. 582-83. So these date cannot be trusted. Ramanuja visted the tirupati temple once in his childhood. The temple after Thirumalai Nambi was managed well except during one time of Gopinath. The local ruler Yadavaraja found some dispute between Shaivas and Vaishnavas regarding the temple and called in court the warring parties to settle the matter. Ramanuja explained clearly that the temple is vaishnavite and the matter was settled that the temple was Vaishnavite. And the Vaishnavites were given more unoccupied land in the base of the hill for settlement. So through the discussion we have seen that the Ramanuja is in 11th and possibly extended to 12 century. So the earliest dispute seems to be between Shaivites and vaishnavites, which has been decided in favour of Thirupati being Vishnu temple.

Conclusion
The Conclusion is that the Tirupati is a Vishnu temple all along. Since the temple has been built in 9th century AD. It is after 9th century AD that the hill is said to be holy place. So any account which says that the hill is holy(sri or Thiru venkata) is after 9th century AD. This applies any work or devote singing on Tirupati. The dispute seems to be primarily between Shivite and Vaishnavite, because of the Shiva Temple at the base of Tirupati which predate the Tirupati temple. Indologist seems to have introduced some confusion here. There are no inscriptions about Tripati temple, before 9th century AD, because the temple did not exist then, not because it was a Buddhist Shrine.

References

Tirupati Balaji was a Buddhist Shrine
by K. Jamanadas
History of Holy Shrine of Sri venkatesa in Tirupati by Krishnaswamy Aiyangar